1/6/2024 0 Comments Git rebase ontoEdit ( e): You would like to change the content of the commit.Similar to pick but will pause and give you the chance to alter the commit message. Reword ( r): You would like to change the commit message of the commit.Rearranging the order of the pick commands changes the order of the commits when the rebase is underway. Pick ( p): You would like to keep that commit as it is (this is the default action).Interactive rebase is more powerful than standard rebase, as it offers complete control over the branch’s commit history.Įntering the rebase session the user is presented with series of commits which can be altered with the available commands: pick 3718a197 Commit#1 pick 8c8fd68a Commit#2 pick e23b7527 Commit#3 pick 181e3ec4 Commit#4 # Rebase 20913a56.2f2b483f onto 20913a56 (4 commands) # Commands: # p, pick = use commit # r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message # e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending # s, squash = use commit, but meld into previous commit # f, fixup = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message # x, exec = run command (the rest of the line) using shell # d, drop = remove commit This allows altering the commits as they are moved to the new branch. This opens an editor where you can enter commands for each commit to be rebased. This rebases the current branch onto but uses an interactive rebasing session. Running git rebase with the -i flag begins an interactive rebasing session. To everybody else, it will look like the entire feature was developed in a single series of well-planned commits. This gives them the opportunity to squash insignificant commits, delete obsolete ones, and make sure everything else is in order before committing to the public project history. Most developers like to use an interactive rebase to polish a feature branch before merging it into the main code base. Once the work is finished, history can be revisited and necessary modifications applied. This gives a lot of freedom to developers, as it lets them focus more on writing quality code and don't worry about “messy” history while they’re doing it. Interactive rebasing gives you complete control how your project history looks like. The unique changes from the feature branch are now becoming the part of the linear history of the branch. It does this by re-writing the project history by creating brand new commits for each commit in the original (feature) branch. In short: this moves the entire feature branch on top of the branch. ![]() Once completed, HEAD (the current commit), is a descendant of, but it contains all the changes as if it had been merged with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |